I have a confession: I want to be a very good writer.
For years I have attempted to become good at many different things. I still do: I pick up an instrument, or decide to learn a language. As soon as the novelty of doing something new wears off, I put it down. When I'm trying to get close to someone, I want us to already be best friends. If I'm dating someone, I want us to already be deeply in love.
I’m impatient to be better now. I don't want to practice my instrument for thousands of hours, listening to squeaks. I don’t want to learn how to manage boundaries or learn more about the other person. I want to be good at it now.
Impatience is uncomfortable because dissonance is uncomfortable. I think that I should be good at writing without putting in any work. Then, when I write, I see that I am not good. I want it to be this way, but instead it’s that way.
Impatience is one of the worst traits I can imagine. It's a sort of shallow anger combined with laziness, all born of deep arrogance. I’m such a big deal. Why can’t anyone else see that?
Patience allows me to not expect greatness from myself and clearing that expectation makes room for actual learning. It allows me to enjoy the process that makes up most of my life. It's what keeps me going when there seems to be no payoff for all my hard work. It helps me nurse a genuine interest in the thing I am attempting to master.
I still have mixed feelings about books like Wherever You Go: self-help based on Buddhist ideals that washes a lot of the actual religion out. But I know that demonizing casual interest is counter-productive to any learning process.
I also know that Jon Kabat-Zinn’s books are quite popular among the demographic commonly called "nightstand Buddhists." The idea is that many people don’t call themselves Buddhists, but may read books that are very Buddhist in nature which are apparently kept on a nightstand. I think that's meant as something of a derogatory name, meant to separate the real-as-corn Buddhists from all those fake ones with the most unforgivable trait: having a casual interest.
I don’t want to be a casual writer and I certainly don’t want to be a casual editor, but I know the steps must be taken in order. Classes must be taken, instructional books read, and, most importantly, practice must be undertaken, apparently in the form of badly-written blog posts.
So here’s to the nightstand Buddhist, and to casual interest, the only reason any of us are good at anything.
Hey!
*Want to see these essays in your inbox as soon as they are published? Click here and scroll down to Get In Touch to send me a message. Please use the subject heading: "Put me on your email list."
Comments